Back to the summary page
Download Position Paper
Firstly, new technologies can enable the active, vibrant, relevant teaching of English. They need not replace traditional texts. They need not undermine traditional skills. They can aid motivation, understanding, engagement, analysis and creativity.
Secondly, forms of communication have changed radically in the past few years. We need to help our students understand, critique and produce the new media in which they are immersed. Students also need to experience a learning environment that reflects the media rich environment outside school.
As a profession, we cannot ignore ICT. By far the largest component of ICT is the C: communication. We don't have to embrace every aspect of it, any more than we do of the printed word. But we do need to acknowledge young people's use of Web 2.0 technology and we need to understand how to harness their creative potential in the classroom.
Inevitably, an answer to this question will date quite quickly. Nevertheless, at the time of writing, it seems to us that:
We want to achieve an e-confident classroom. Or, to avoid the perhaps irritating 'e-' prefix, English classrooms where both teacher and students are at home using ICT as and when it is appropriate.
In three areas, which can be summarised as
The increased/enhanced use of VLEs – all schools must have them in place by 2008 - opens up huge potential for self-publishing, electronic drafting, independent learning any time, anywhere etc. English will benefit from these new models of learning/ accessing information/ communicating. (The Building Schools of the Future programme, about to be rolled out by NCSL, will make much of this.)
It will not have escaped your notice that these areas are exactly those where non-ICT approaches are also appropriate....
In all these considerations, it is important that we keep in the forefront of our minds, the principles of enhancement and extension. ICT is still an expensive and scarce resource; it still poses challenges to teachers in terms of confidence and time. Therefore, if we are to propose its use, we need to be sure that it is helping us to do something new, something better or something beyond what we could achieve by other more traditional means.
Faced with a plethora of techniques, products and resources competing for limited time and budget, it might be useful to consider the following points when planning Schemes of Work, deciding the allocation of hardware and software resources or the spending of money – whether the department's or the school's.
The most worthwhile resources employing ICT in English tend to:
Sometimes training is simply not very good, or does not focus on the specific needs of teachers of English. Sometimes, though, teachers attend training and show enthusiasm but practice in school does not change. The other pressures of daily teaching overcome many good intentions.
Support is essential, from outside and inside. The key is often the attitude of the head of the department, the Head or SMT. Action plans with key dates and planned report-backs to the group can help to raise the priority of ICT in schemes of work and in the day to day experience of teaching. Intervention and support from LA is another way of sustaining momentum.
Schools frequently rely on one very keen teacher and as a result practice does not improve for the others in the department. 'So-and-so is our ICT expert' can be an excuse for inactivity and can make the school vulnerable when that teacher leaves.
The ICT 'expert' needs to be empowered to encourage the rest of the team: to become the agent for change, not the person who does it all.
Sometimes the work of individual teachers remains hidden.
There needs to be a systematic trawl for good practice, independent of departmental seniority (NQTs are often innovators here) which is celebrated and spread within the department and, where appropriate across other curricular areas as well as beyond the school.
Schools cite numerous, legitimate reasons why they haven't made progress, often a consequence of equipment or accommodation shortcomings. English departments are frequently seen as areas where ICT is less necessary or technical support is unavailable. Access to computer suites is very often difficult or impossible at certain times of the week or certain year groups.
Sometimes a particular technology can act as a catalyst, e.g. IWBs or laptops; there is no better argument for further resources than demonstrating that current resources are being used to their full, and used effectively.
Departments need to argue for fair access to technology from a position of knowledge. The more English teachers understand what equipment they need as well as when and why they want it, the more likely those in management will listen.
Some teachers may find it hard to translate ICT based training materials to the reality of their own classrooms. Continuing support within and beyond the department is vital as is the provision and development of resources and approaches which are targeted at specific identifiable needs. Clear demonstrations of the usefulness of ICT with a subject-specific emphasis are helpful, leading to departmentally produced Scheme of Work specific ICT-based resources.
The plethora of new technology can be daunting and alarming. The seeming familiarity of students with new technologies can also be seen as challenging. Many teachers will not feel comfortable if expected to master lots of different aspects of ICT in a short space of time. Personal and departmental development needs to take account of this and work to achievable goals: simple, effective approaches which will have an impact on learning and teaching.
Nor should student knowledge be a problem. It can be very helpful to recognise what students know and, indeed, harness that knowledge. Remember, though, that they frequently will not know how to apply that knowledge in an educational context and will the guidance of teachers to do so.
There are, then, hugely practical reasons for us, as teachers of English in all its manifestations, to make good use of the new tools available – and to make sure that they are not left in the hands of technocrats, bureaucrats and target-setters. Beyond the practical there is a wider need for us to deliver teaching and learning that is relevant to a digital generation, to view technology not just as a tool (or a treat) but as an entitlement; an entitlement which opens up new types of resources and different ways of learning and communicating
As practitioners, we need to establish learning environments that attract young people and make the subject of English (and indeed all other areas of learning) vital in terms of their current and future interests, their place in an increasingly global community and their role in an increasingly networked society.
Alongside all this, we continue to espouse the value of just learning to read, of enjoying reading for the sake of our imaginations and creativity and what this offers to our ability to create, generate and communicate ideas; in addition, we celebrate all that writing in its many forms has to offer and how both remain central to a truly broad and balanced curriculum, the world of employment and life beyond both school and work.
Web 2 technology: a term given, rather loosely, to what are called 'second-generation' web based functions. These would include social networking sites, podcasts and blogs and highlights peer to peer relationships rather than the top-down ones which currently dominate internet usage.
VLE: Virtual Learning Environment: an area linked by a network where resources can be stored, and to which students and teachers can upload work. Students and teachers can use a VLE to interact; and teachers can provide on-line support. For example, assignments can be submitted for assessment or students can use a discussion area to share ideas and opinions about current projects. In some cases, students can pursue a learning pathway receiving feedback as they progress. Teachers can also share work and resources with other teachers. There is some controversy surrounding VLEs and their practical value; it is not a foregone conclusion that they will deliver the educational gains which some proponents suggest.